3 ms·
I think it should also mean that if Twitter was able to successfully do this, they no longer require any protections from Section 230. They're in full editori
by akira2501 4y ago
I think it should also mean that if Twitter was able to successfully do this, they no longer require any protections from Section 230. They're in full editorial control of the property, they shouldn't enjoy any further legal shields while simultaneously enjoying this apparent total oversight.
- jbarciauskas 4y agoThis is not how Section 230 works at all. The CDA got rid of the neutral platfom requirement. You are spreading misinformation. https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/22/20700099/section-230-communications-decency-act-republicans-congress-big-tech-vergecast-weeds-podcast https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/22/20700099/section-230-comm...
- akira2501 4y agoYou are intentionally being uncharitable, and in your rush, you ignored the first two words of my statement. I'm glad large tech monopolies got yet another giveaway from our congress, and if that's a flag you want to wave, be my guest; but, I still stand by my assertion.