3 ms·
Yep. That's my take. The vision is that you write code in any language you like. You compile (transpile?) it down to efficient low-level JS (WASM), run in the b
by test6554 4y ago
Yep. That's my take. The vision is that you write code in any language you like. You compile (transpile?) it down to efficient low-level JS (WASM), run in the browser as if you wrote JS code.
I have zero experience with it, but I think I get it and it's neat. I'm a little curious about what working with the DOM is like in C# > WASM or Rust > WASM. I pitty the foo who had to code that... and will we get non-breaking, more efficient native DOM manipulation at some point?
- MuffinFlavored 4y agohttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/59708546/access-the-dom-in-webassembly https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59708546/access-the-dom-...
- Garlef 4y agoWASM is not low level JS There was a "predecessor" project (Asm.js) that would output low level JS, though. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31502563/what-is-the-difference-between-asm-js-and-webassembly https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31502563/what-is-the-dif...