The most interesting thing to me, reading the story, and the materials provided, is that you do not see a nefarious, explicitly partisan, ruthless campaign to c

The most interesting thing to me, reading the story, and the materials provided, is that you do not see a nefarious, explicitly partisan, ruthless campaign to censor information with the specific and stated goal of influencing an election. This is what we are constantly told MUST be happening behind the scenes. Instead, what you see is a lot of people, acting in good faith, trying to make decisions and appease a lot divergent concerns in the middle of a developing story. With a lot of internal disagreement and debate. I know Tailbi has said there are "bigger revelations to come", but so far, this is utterly banal internal policy coordination and decision making.