I thought my brief convo about whether ChatGPT had mental states was interesting: https://mobile.twitter.com/naasking/status/1598802001428566016 https://mobile

I thought my brief convo about whether ChatGPT had mental states was interesting: https://mobile.twitter.com/naasking/status/1598802001428566016 https://mobile.twitter.com/naasking/status/15988020014285660... It basically continued to strenuously reiterate that it definitely, 100% had no mental states, despite agreeing with my argument that we do not yet have enough information to reach such a conclusion and so it could actually have mental states. Given the repetitive and formulaic nature of the replies, I suspect OpenAI is very explicitly trying avoid another LaMDA scandal.