There is no free speech absolutism. It is public record ("no freedom of reach"): Twitter is drowning out negative comments. It is shielding the public from crit

There is no free speech absolutism. It is public record ("no freedom of reach"): Twitter is drowning out negative comments. It is shielding the public from criticisms of established enterprise, press, government. Freedom of speech to people like J. S. Mill served a very vital purpose. It was not just some abstract negative right. Having access to this type of information isn't any less important as being able to publicize it. It's a travesty. Whether a fringe right-wing crank is at liberty to discuss the merits of Adolf Hitler is a minor issue at this point.