> take a look at this comment It’s hacker news. People say all sorts of inflammatory crap here. I discount anything said here, especially in response to an art

> take a look at this comment It’s hacker news. People say all sorts of inflammatory crap here. I discount anything said here, especially in response to an article about said topic. If my c++ writing coworker shared that opinion with me, or someone at a conference, that’s be different. > Modern C++ has many memory safety features. If a company has learned that its people fail to use them, then bad for them I will admit I vaguely agree with this. My company has all sorts of tools that perform basic checks for memory safety and a style guide that is very opinionated. Just because we can’t switch easily doesn’t mean we can’t try to improve as an org. I don’t avow the belief that any program is truly smart enough/too dumb to make bugs, but I do think the organization maintaining the code has a responsibility to improve. Especially a large organization. Whether that’s better code review processes, automated tooling, or even soft-banning the use of certain unsafe practices.