4 ms·
>personally had an experience ... that is salient enough for him to supersede free speech. what? how is that valid? the whole point is being able to say some
by vcvzsa3221 4y ago
>personally had an experience ... that is salient enough for him to supersede free speech.
what? how is that valid? the whole point is being able to say something regardless of if it hurts someones feelings.
- llamaimperative 4y agoIt's not valid, that's how. He's using "free speech" as a way to hype up all the right winger fanboys and to unban people who will cause incredible drama (i.e. engagement) on Twitter. Hopefully all it causes is online drama, but the barrier between real world actions and online information sphere is way more permeable than the "it's just a website!" people would have you believe. It has nothing to do with principles of any sort.
- 0x4d464d48 4y agoYeah. Impossible to write off harrassment and doxxing to "It's just a website!"