So they want either: - "fully qualified names" ... to some arbitrary obvious-after-the-fact degree, because fully FULL qualification becomes one of the heavywe

So they want either: - "fully qualified names" ... to some arbitrary obvious-after-the-fact degree, because fully FULL qualification becomes one of the heavyweight barriers he doesn't like: a central name validator/registry, reduced ability to reuse data because of the funny wrapping/name - universal data typing, but that doesn't exist, and would be a barrier if it was - universal data formats: oh god, that means standards bodies, doesn't it. I totally agree about the make services interact --> they interact, but there's security holes --> impose security loop.