4 ms·
Running a publication like future.com costs peanuts. If they are pinching pennies like this, a16z must be in big trouble?
by karp773 4y ago
Running a publication like future.com costs peanuts. If they are pinching pennies like this, a16z must be in big trouble?
- meheleventyone 4y agoMaybe more along the lines of if your freely accessible vanity press gets no readers does that reflect well.
- rchaud 4y agoNot necessarily. Now that Twitter is in friendlier hands, they simply may not feel the need to shovel more SEO blogspam into the furnace.
- karp773 4y agoYou are probably right. It does look like a SEO spam site!
- gcanyon 4y agoIt still comes down to cost/benefit -- no matter how small the cost monetarily, there's still the conceptual/attention/time aspect, and it's always possible for the benefit to be so little that the cost isn't justified.