3 ms·
I agree with you - it is a weeder-outer, but not an includer-inner - there are lots of people who can write code to reverse linked-lists that I don't want to hi
by gordonguthrie 15y ago
I agree with you - it is a weeder-outer, but not an includer-inner - there are lots of people who can write code to reverse linked-lists that I don't want to hire.
In particular I don't want to hire the people who would rather write their own implementation than use a library (think Not-Invented-Here and Yak Shaving).
- eru 15y agoIndeed. By the way, in purely functional implementations of a list reversal there are non-trivial trade-offs to make. (See Janestreet's standard libraries for OCaml.)