4 ms·

i dont understand what you mean

• pjmlp 4y ago
  No need for Clojure on Rust, when there are already several mature Common Lisp and Scheme toolchains, compiling to native code for the last 40 years.
  • medo-bear 4y ago
    i am a big advocate for common lisp use but i still don't see your point. are you saying that the whole point of having a clojure on rust is to have native compilation? because i imagine "clojure on rust" for the parent means having a clojure-like-syntax on rust, keeping in mind that rust is a statically typed language (kind of a big point of rust)
    • pjmlp 4y ago
      Common Lisp supports gradual typing.
      • medo-bear 4y ago
        but not static mem allocation
        • pjmlp 4y ago
          It surely does, including stack values. That is the thing, Lisp is not only lists unless one is stuck using Lisp 1.5.
          • medo-bear 4y ago
            i dont think were talking about the same thing unless youre claiming that common lisp can be non garbage collected. otherwise stack allocation is very implementation dependent