3 ms·
The stats come from Google project(s) - you can be sure that they've used the best practices. If they've failed, rest assured that 90%+ of the rest of the devs
by pizza234 4y ago
The stats come from Google project(s) - you can be sure that they've used the best practices. If they've failed, rest assured that 90%+ of the rest of the devs will fail, and much worse.
- josefx 4y ago> he stats come from Google project(s) - you can be sure that they've used the best practices The first Google Style Guide for C++ I ever came across in the wild espoused C with classes, had "standard" in scare quotes and banned most of boost for encouraging functional programming. I almost threw a fit when someone unironically tried to push that POS at work because "Google", it was entirely nonsensical especially given that we made heavy use of boost and math libraries with operator overloading.
- vineyardmike 4y ago> someone unironically tried to push that POS at work because "Google" Especially since Google has a ton of automated tools to perform tests and analysis on code, and enforces certain behavior before you can merge your code in. Something that is probably missing from a smaller organization that’s simply adopting their style guide. Also probably missing is googles alternative stdlib they use.