>>The argument is that the money could be better spent on lobbying for government aid and price limits. By whose judgement? If someone comes to me and asks fo

>>The argument is that the money could be better spent on lobbying for government aid and price limits. By whose judgement? If someone comes to me and asks for money for their medical treatment, of course I'm going to give them it. They need it now, I'm going to help. Or are we going to argue that this money that I spent would have been better off donated to an organisation that lobbies government for regulating medicine prices(while the person who needs help now suffers because they aren't getting the meds). It just strikes me as such armchair judgement of the situation(not you personally, I mean the general criticism around this).