3 ms·
Well, Chinese is not obfuscated. On the contrary, it's written form carries a more direct interpretation that combining alphabet letters. Do you actually know
by muyuu 15y ago
Well, Chinese is not obfuscated. On the contrary, it's written form carries a more direct interpretation that combining alphabet letters.
Do you actually know enough of both Chinese and English to judge this? because it would be a bit silly to discuss with someone who does, if you don't.
- Someone 15y agoI make no claim about Chinese or English. I merely pointed out that the logical argument given is flawed, and hence, does not carry weight.
- muyuu 15y agoIt's not flawed in its context. It would be flawed if your point was valid. For your point to be valid, the obfuscation you imply should either be true, or unknown. It's not unknown to whoever knows the language. It's simply false. In other words, you cannot assume a variable to be unknown when one of the parties does know it.