4 ms·
Being “intimately involved with suppression of speech at the behest of the government and political interests” exactly describes the job of removing child sexua
by snowwrestler 4y ago
Being “intimately involved with suppression of speech at the behest of the government and political interests” exactly describes the job of removing child sexual assault content.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoAre you familiar with logical fallacy? Yes, bad things are on the internet. That is in no way the content or information I'm describing, nor does it fall into the category of legal free speech. Bringing up illegal things to argument the suppression of legal speech is, I don't know, moronic. You are perpetuating a tired trope and I haven't the energy to persist with this discussion
- upsidesinclude 4y agohttps://twitter.com/elizableu/status/1599484564832854017?cxt=HHwWgoCp6ZevwbIsAAAA https://twitter.com/elizableu/status/1599484564832854017?cxt... This is where you get bent. Your logical fallacy is detailed here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion I hope that, despite what you are implying, this success by Musk is not upsetting to you.
- abigail95 4y agoA better word is partisan or authoritarian interests.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoHey, it begs the question, how many authoritarian and partisan tactics can one utilize before being considered an partisan authoritarian?