Sounds to me like you just don't want to take a stab at any of the problems that actually occur in centralized power structures, and you'd likely say the same t

Sounds to me like you just don't want to take a stab at any of the problems that actually occur in centralized power structures, and you'd likely say the same thing to anything in any subject via armchair. Why should anyone assign any credibility to what you say when you've been disingenous yourself upfront and put your own words in other people's mouths. Key elements of socialism are centralized power structure, lack or eroding of property rights, and issues often revolve around corruption, monopoly (which is often called capitalism, though its not), seizures, lack of accountability, and the limited production receives little benefit from divisions of labor tending towards the lowest common denominator. Why should anyone listen to you if you can't even add anything to the conversation (likely because you don't know)?