3 ms·
Yes, of course, I agree. Again, I'd rather a bunch of the stuff Apple prohibits were simply illegal (plus a few things they don't) and that several huge compani
by yamtaddle 4y ago
Yes, of course, I agree. Again, I'd rather a bunch of the stuff Apple prohibits were simply illegal (plus a few things they don't) and that several huge companies, including Apple, were broken up into a dozen or more parts. But in the meantime I'm glad to have one platform where some of those practices are effectively illegal, at least. The second government steps up I'll be thrilled to see them smashed to bits (and hopefully not only them—and hey, those others don't have to wait as far as I'm concerned!).
- trap_goes_hot 4y agoMoney = Power. Why would Apple allow this breaking up? Its naive to think otherwise, see what is happening in South Korea with Samsung accounting for like 25% of the economy. They're untouchable in South Korea.
- lofaszvanitt 4y agoThat is an umbrella of 15+ companies in multiple segments of the market.
- trap_goes_hot 4y agoYes, that structure is complex by-design. Its to do with inheritance taxes, and the family trying to maintain control via holding companies. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62501514 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62501514 Apple has a somewhat complicated (though common for large US corporations) structure too. https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-subsidiaries-are-named-for-apples-2016-8 https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-subsidiaries-are-named... https://www.wired.com/2016/08/apple-rest-silicon-valley-avoids-tax-man/ https://www.wired.com/2016/08/apple-rest-silicon-valley-avoi...