2 ms·
But yeah, SBF was very much a proponent of increased regulations and worked closely with US politicians and the SEC. They were "legit" to public view, but behin
by throwaway87274 4y ago
But yeah, SBF was very much a proponent of increased regulations and worked closely with US politicians and the SEC. They were "legit" to public view, but behind the scenes was unprecedented financial incompetence and fraud. And to clarify, they definitely had a business presence in the US with their US site and that would fall under US jurisdiction. I thought of applying there because it seemed like a cool place to work but they were only hiring for their Chicago office at the time. Glad I dodged that bullet in retrospect