> So, according to your argument, which you've stated twice now[1], it's okay for regulation of consumer devices. I have said no such thing. I was challenging

> So, according to your argument, which you've stated twice now[1], it's okay for regulation of consumer devices. I have said no such thing. I was challenging the assertion that we “demand [the option to control our devices] of almost all non-phone appliances”. I said nothing at all about the “good” or “badness” of regulation. The rest of your comment continues this bad faith interpretation of my argument and puts words in my mouth, so we’re done here.