No, the author specifically questions that assertion. > "[...] it’s common to hear people claim that you can’t notice 50ms or 100ms of latency because human re

No, the author specifically questions that assertion. > "[...] it’s common to hear people claim that you can’t notice 50ms or 100ms of latency because human reaction time is 200ms. This doesn’t actually make sense because there are independent quantities. This line of argument is like saying that you wouldn’t notice a flight being delayed by an hour because the duration of the flight is six hours." Separately, I'm very much in the "can notice sub-50ms latencies," but a lifetime of work in digital audio and video will do that.