3 ms·
Yes. That is 200k more than what Firefox should be paying for a non dev. Could they hire 2 100k developers more ? I would be happy if that was done. Its not l
by 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
Yes. That is 200k more than what Firefox should be paying for a non dev.
Could they hire 2 100k developers more ? I would be happy if that was done.
Its not like Tim cook has to manage "shareholders expectations" or "show off the company is well off that they can pay a CEO so much".
- zasdffaa 4y agoA good non-dev can be hugely helpful to devs and much increase their productivity. To repeat: a good one.