This fits with the usual definition of repeatable. Repeatable means that you can run the same steps, but if the steps are non-deterministic, repeating them does

This fits with the usual definition of repeatable. Repeatable means that you can run the same steps, but if the steps are non-deterministic, repeating them doesn't guarantee the same result. > it wouldn't be surprising if it does not build at all. This part is a stronger point, and it's true. When you repeat something and what you get is not just a different version or variation but something with totally different or broken behavior, that seems bigger than an ordinary failure of reproducibility.