> When Serge Egelman came up with a plausible defence I honestly feel like his explanation is likely, but she was in complete denial knowing how she's effectiv

> When Serge Egelman came up with a plausible defence I honestly feel like his explanation is likely, but she was in complete denial knowing how she's effectively left holding the bag. Is she and the company now in a better place having everything revoked but still standing by her assertions? or would it have been better accepting the possibility of what happened and instead tried to work with everyone involved? Serge was giving her rope to pull herself out of this hole and she just seemed to want to wrap it around her own neck instead...