> I'd argue it could be termed "what-aboutism", I agree that it's "what-aboutism". In that regard, it does nothing to establish that TrustCor meets the standa

> I'd argue it could be termed "what-aboutism", I agree that it's "what-aboutism". In that regard, it does nothing to establish that TrustCor meets the standards for being a CA. It does raise a good question for parallel discussion, though: Should Mozilla also be scrutinizing a whole bunch of other CAs as well?