3 ms·
The directive is a bit hard to read, but its widely understood to require at least notification before storing information on a user's device, probably consent.
by jefftk 4y ago
The directive is a bit hard to read, but its widely understood to require at least notification before storing information on a user's device, probably consent. The guidance is a lot clearer: https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2012/wp194_en.pdf https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinio...
- hyperman1 4y agoI'm not sure the guidance applies in this case, as this technique is an edge case which the writers probably didn't foresee. The ePrivacy directive itself has in article 3.1: This Directive shall apply to the processing of personal data [...] which would mean it doesnt apply here, as there is no personal data. In practice, I assume this one is for the judges.