For me, there was zero “ugh wall of text tldr” and a whole lot of “that wall of text I just read is obviously designed to obfuscate and hinder discussion” follo

For me, there was zero “ugh wall of text tldr” and a whole lot of “that wall of text I just read is obviously designed to obfuscate and hinder discussion” followed by noticing that she relentlessly kept pasting the SAME irrelevant/misleading walls of text over and over. She seemed to be actively trying to provoke the “ugh tldr” response as a tactic. An example is the bit of boilerplate that kept repeating how the app was BETA and could only have gone to a small percentage of people (not relevant), and it wasn’t ever “published” (which is a lie) and how sdks get updated all the time and it is not our place to speculate about how that might have happened. This is an extremely abridged version of this “argument” that she trotted out repeatedly just trying to tire people out. There are many other examples of this type tactic in her responses. The overall effect is that she very much appears to be arguing in bad faith.