3 ms·
So that means that for employees that were hired fill-time in-office that are now remote should get a pay cut? Or that someone that chooses to pay less in rent
by balderdash 4y ago
So that means that for employees that were hired fill-time in-office that are now remote should get a pay cut? Or that someone that chooses to pay less in rent and commute longer should be paid more than someone who pays more in rent and commute less?
- antihero 4y agoNo they should pay the same, just make the commute expensable. For everyone.
- balderdash 4y agoThat doesn’t address part two of my question, and if the answer is make the commute amount the same for everyone, than, all you are asking for is an across the board pay raise for everyone
- bearmode 4y agoNo, because commuting costs were never taken into account before :)
- lotsofpulp 4y agoCommute costs were always taken into account, and always will be, either implicitly or explicitly. Highly in demand labor sellers have even gotten weekly flights paid for. The only difference is most people are not that in demand, or do not produce work that make it economical to pay them that extra commuting premium.
- dlmilli 4y ago