3 ms·

This assumes the reader knows what is and isn't illegal in every industry

• AmericanChopper 4y ago
  It doesn’t assume that at all. Explaining the known facts relating to legal controversies sounds like reasonable journalism to me. Labelling somebody a crook is a conclusion that the reader may choose to draw from those facts, not one that should be prescribed to them. Have you ever broken the law? You almost certainly have. Does that make you a crook?
  • influxmoment 4y ago
    I never admitted to stealing over a billion dollars. The criminal himself said he was a criminal that took funds
    • AmericanChopper 4y ago
      When did he say that?