2 ms·
in my judgement, the quality of this information (methodology, population size, etc.) is not even close to good enough to rely on when making decisions about th
by jstrong 4y ago
in my judgement, the quality of this information (methodology, population size, etc.) is not even close to good enough to rely on when making decisions about the well-being of my children. 250 kids, 5 years, study ends when they were 11-15 ... nope, nope, nope.
reminds me of the scene in the most recent yellowstone episode, the scientist stridently insisting destroying 7000 acres of sage brush couldn't possibly hurt sage grouse.
- scotty79 4y agoYeah, probably not a very strong research but we don't have much of research like that yet. But there's really no reason, in absence of research, to expect that phones will be exceptionally damaging to kids that survived just fine such technological banes as books, radio and tv. Last two not only captivating their attention for hours but borderline immobilizing them in one physical spot.