3 ms·
Why do you think a reporter should be deciding who is and who is not a crook? If they adequately report the facts then the reader can be sufficiently informed t
by AmericanChopper 4y ago
Why do you think a reporter should be deciding who is and who is not a crook? If they adequately report the facts then the reader can be sufficiently informed to make up their own mind.
- hanniabu 4y agoThis assumes the reader knows what is and isn't illegal in every industry
- AmericanChopper 4y agoIt doesn’t assume that at all. Explaining the known facts relating to legal controversies sounds like reasonable journalism to me. Labelling somebody a crook is a conclusion that the reader may choose to draw from those facts, not one that should be prescribed to them. Have you ever broken the law? You almost certainly have. Does that make you a crook?
- influxmoment 4y agoI never admitted to stealing over a billion dollars. The criminal himself said he was a criminal that took funds
- AmericanChopper 4y agoWhen did he say that?