I'll concede physics, and settle for the C grade for my Etymonics. But unless you're arguing for the possibility of rigorous economics (I hope not) the spirit o

I'll concede physics, and settle for the C grade for my Etymonics. But unless you're arguing for the possibility of rigorous economics (I hope not) the spirit of my point is the fault-line between praxis and what is broadly universalisable. Is "political science" real? (I personally think there's a case), but why did that have to arise besides politics? I studied electronics and am happy to report, compared to its foundation in physics, it's an ever changing craft of black magic and tricks you can do with silicon and electrons. Need proof? Where is the craft of thermionics today? As for economics, I don't really know. Some days I have hope in its use. Other days I think its very conceit is the root cause of much it sets out to solve.