> Pascal's Wager itself away I was not familiar with that term. Still, I think I disagree that a firm conviction based on perceived and/or veririfiable facts a

> Pascal's Wager itself away I was not familiar with that term. Still, I think I disagree that a firm conviction based on perceived and/or veririfiable facts and/or experience will get subdued because "it's rational to not have this philosophy". In case of a conflict between rational cost/benefit estimate and perceived truth I would think that truth should win at least as often as cost/benefit.