4 ms·

Last I checked, a 4 vCPU/16GB RAM/1TB storage configuration costs around $80 USD per month at VPS hosts like Hetzner. It's $762 USD per month on RDS. There are

Last I checked, a 4 vCPU/16GB RAM/1TB storage configuration costs around $80 USD per month at VPS hosts like Hetzner. It's $762 USD per month on RDS. There are trade-offs of course (https://onlineornot.com/self-hosting-vs-managed-services-deciding-how-host-your-database https://onlineornot.com/self-hosting-vs-managed-services-dec...) between the two options. I've been hoping fly.io builds a strong automated middle ground for a while now!

w-ll 4y ago
Am I reading https://instances.vantage.sh/rds/?min_vcpus=4&cost_duration=monthly https://instances.vantage.sh/rds/?min_vcpus=4&cost_duration=... wrong. It seams you can get that as a db.t4g.xlarge for ~$188/month. Still more than 2x the cost, but not nearly $760
- ithrow 4y ago
  $188 without storage and bandwidth.
- some_developer 4y ago
  > for ~$188/month. Note that this is still the on-demand price. Although it's still not Apple to Apple, no one (sane) would useRDS 24x7 without RI. That probably brings you down another 50 bucks or so.
- mnutt 4y ago
  The t4g instances are also burstable so running your database with 4 cores under load would either get you throttled or produce more charges.
  - losteric 4y ago
    and the price excludes the 1.5 TB EBS volume
- whakim 4y ago
  Yeah, tack on another $115 or so for the 1TB of storage. And as a sibling comment mentions, on-demand pricing means it isn't really an apples-to-apples comparison. In almost every case other than a hobby project it feels like the convenience of RDS vastly outweighs the savings of ~$250 you'd get by self-hosting.
macNchz 4y ago
A few years ago I managed a 10TB Postgres cluster backing a moderately high traffic site. I no longer even give the briefest of blinks at any of the fully managed database prices that used to make my eyes water.
- DiggyJohnson 4y ago
  Because you feel like you got good value for your 10TB DB or because you feel like you got fleeced? Not sure I understand your undertone. Cheers
  - HillRat 4y ago
    I think the implication is, “I used to manage my own DB instance and I’m now willing to pay anything even vaguely reasonable to not have to do that again.”
    - macNchz 4y ago
      Correct!

w-ll 4y ago

Am I reading https://instances.vantage.sh/rds/?min_vcpus=4&cost_duration=monthly https://instances.vantage.sh/rds/?min_vcpus=4&cost_duration=... wrong. It seams you can get that as a db.t4g.xlarge for ~$188/month. Still more than 2x the cost, but not nearly $760

ithrow 4y ago
$188 without storage and bandwidth.
some_developer 4y ago
> for ~$188/month. Note that this is still the on-demand price. Although it's still not Apple to Apple, no one (sane) would useRDS 24x7 without RI. That probably brings you down another 50 bucks or so.
mnutt 4y ago
The t4g instances are also burstable so running your database with 4 cores under load would either get you throttled or produce more charges.
- losteric 4y ago
  and the price excludes the 1.5 TB EBS volume
whakim 4y ago
Yeah, tack on another $115 or so for the 1TB of storage. And as a sibling comment mentions, on-demand pricing means it isn't really an apples-to-apples comparison. In almost every case other than a hobby project it feels like the convenience of RDS vastly outweighs the savings of ~$250 you'd get by self-hosting.

macNchz 4y ago

A few years ago I managed a 10TB Postgres cluster backing a moderately high traffic site. I no longer even give the briefest of blinks at any of the fully managed database prices that used to make my eyes water.

DiggyJohnson 4y ago
Because you feel like you got good value for your 10TB DB or because you feel like you got fleeced? Not sure I understand your undertone. Cheers
- HillRat 4y ago
  I think the implication is, “I used to manage my own DB instance and I’m now willing to pay anything even vaguely reasonable to not have to do that again.”
  - macNchz 4y ago
    Correct!