3 ms·
I didn’t say billion though, I said humans have been reshaping the earth for 20k years and that has macro-effects as well that may not have been immediate. You
by edgyquant 4y ago
I didn’t say billion though, I said humans have been reshaping the earth for 20k years and that has macro-effects as well that may not have been immediate. You’re being defensive about this because you’re invested in it and don’t care if there’s more to it than what we thought half a century ago.
- Retric 4y agonickphx just said, “complete historical picture of the planet's cycles over the millions of years?” And you said, “This question hasn’t actually been answered though.” Suddenly you bring up 20k years because what semantic misdirection? I really don’t care about your complete and utter ignorance, but at least try and keep up with a few posts in this thread. As to being defensive, the basic science for global warming is really straightforward. People pretending it’s debatable is like people debating relativity it’s really not in question. Predicting the impact is of course more complex but the underlying effect is both widespread and not particularly complicated. Absorption spectroscopy is incredibly easy to observe, measure, predict, and model.