3 ms·
Maybe their stance is that people shouldn't be banned forever? I personally, don't believe in eternal bans. I always hate the horror stories where someone has
by dismantlethesun 4y ago
Maybe their stance is that people shouldn't be banned forever?
I personally, don't believe in eternal bans. I always hate the horror stories where someone has made a mistake and thus Google bans them from all non-related activities for life, then bans the account of anyone who gave that person privileges too.
With respect to Twitter, I'd say sure Trump is an insurrectionist and a shameful individual, but it's been 2 years... while we can't all rightly forgive him, we can at least him speak his thoughts in 280 characters or less.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Maybe their stance is that people shouldn't be banned forever? They are entitled to that stance, and advertisers uncomfortable with either the actual or anticipated results of that stance are entitled to not advertise on Twitter.