2 ms·
I think the sticky wicket here is that the author did not feel like they were part of the succession planning and were somewhat blindsided by it. I agree he pr
by bumby 4y ago
I think the sticky wicket here is that the author did not feel like they were part of the succession planning and were somewhat blindsided by it.
I agree he probably should have been proactive in making sure someone can step in his role. But also his management should have kept him in the loop and, ideally, playing a fundamental role in selecting his successors. None of that seemed to happen, so it seemed like bad leadership all around.
- q1w2 4y agoMaybe. I always take these stories with a grain of salt. The author demonstrates a lot of emotion in his post, so it's hard to know the truth with only one side of the story.