> There are some places where ITAR makes sense, even if it does overreach in areas like encryption or model rocketry. > For example, I'd argue that it's a posi

> There are some places where ITAR makes sense, even if it does overreach in areas like encryption or model rocketry. > For example, I'd argue that it's a positive thing that Lockheed couldn't sell F-22s to [insert violent autocrat of the month] without some very significant reviews. Lockheed's not honest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_bribery_scandals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_bribery_scandals Regardless, ITAR is a very broad law and a Cold War relic.