14 ms·
Is removing rejects not a way to pick only the best? It is not, unless your rejection criteria is "everything that is not the best." However, if your rejection
by dec0dedab0de 4y ago
Is removing rejects not a way to pick only the best?
It is not, unless your rejection criteria is "everything that is not the best." However, if your rejection criteria is "not meeting basic requirements" then you are left with the best, and the second best and the middle, all the way down to the bottom of adequate.
- Xelynega 4y agoSo if "basic requirements" in this case are "on first glance like a face good enough to fool a human", I don't see how you could have a "best" criteria that's significantly different without accounting for the odd glitches in the current set. You're making a distinction that I understand can exits. I'm just failing to see where it exists in this case.