4 ms·
Arable land includes meadows, pastures, etc. Animals can (and do) eat from those lands, but cropland is more specific. Your weird tangent has no relevance.
by randomdata 4y ago
Arable land includes meadows, pastures, etc. Animals can (and do) eat from those lands, but cropland is more specific. Your weird tangent has no relevance.
- myshpa 4y ago> Probably not without radically changing how we grow plants for human consumption ... Wrong. > ~60% of the soybeans are intended for direct human consumption and ~40% for animal consumption. I imagine that is not atypical Wrong. > around 35% of the output ... for animal consumption, which is effectively what the real world data also shows ... Wrong. > Nowhere near 50% of the world's land area is suitable for cropland. Wrong. > Your own link suggests that only 23% of agricultural lands are suitable for cropland. Wrong. > Arable land includes meadows, pastures, etc. Animals can (and do) eat from those lands, but cropland is more specific Wrong (in the context of) https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/01/Global-land-use-graphic.png https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/01/Global-land-use-g... > Your weird tangent ... It's called logic. I give up.