3 ms·
I agree - in fact the problem was solved by removing some unnecessary type-checking code. The point I was trying to make is that it's easier to learn the basic
by hassing 15y ago
I agree - in fact the problem was solved by removing some unnecessary type-checking code.
The point I was trying to make is that it's easier to learn the basics of types and logic in a strict system. Implicit type conversion and polymorphism can easily result in misunderstandings when you've just started learning to program.
- BerislavLopac 15y ago"Easier" is (usually) the enemy of "better".
- hassing 15y agoAgain. These are classes for _beginners_. I'm not suggesting that you should never learn these things. They should also learn functional programming, estimating how algorithms perform, concurrent programming, binary trees, and a few hundred other things. But Programming is not something you master overnight. You need to understand that 2+2=4 before you can understand that 2+i^2=1.
- BerislavLopac 15y agoYou are correct, but in that case it's not the question of what is easier, but what is necessary. "Easier" implies that there is a choice between comparable options, not that one is the prerequisite for the other.