> You seem to view things with a very broad brush, did you actually read the magazine Yes, the print edition. Care to actually rebuke my arguments instead of m

> You seem to view things with a very broad brush, did you actually read the magazine Yes, the print edition. Care to actually rebuke my arguments instead of making assumptions? > Just as an example, did you read the things Mearsheimer wrote? I googled this because I was confused because I could not remember seeing his ideas there (which I remember finding totally ridiculous). Turns out this was a "by invitation" section, clearly presented as an outside opinion. I haven't seen them reiterate his ideas anywhere (which I'd summarize as "it's totally OK for powerful countries to scare neighbours into becoming 'buffer zone' client states without any say in the matter"), they're very much for Ukraine's ability to determine their own future. If you're angry about a paper publishing opinion pieces you're going to be angry about just about every paper out there because every one of them is going to sooner or later publish an opinion piece that you disagree with. That's the whole idea of opinion sections.