3 ms·
Two thoughts on the Javascript being enabled required: 1. What percentage of users do you feel are browsing without JS? 2. Its open source, would you be willing
by invirtu 4y ago
Two thoughts on the Javascript being enabled required:
1. What percentage of users do you feel are browsing without JS?
2. Its open source, would you be willing to make a non-js version?
- sylware 4y ago1 - if you don't understand why it is important to be browsable with light/lean/noscript/basic (x)html browsers, why do you want me to tell you? That said, I should read for good how they did define the <video>/<audio> HTML elements for the various types of video/audio content (HLS, rtsp, etc) in order to configure automatically and properly my media player. 2 - Well, I am currently working already on, what I think, are more critical projects, but "never say never". Currently, I can manage to "view"/browse twitch or youtube live without the massive browsers based on blink/geeko (financed by google, a vanguard/blackrock company via alphabet) or webkit (financed by apple, a vanguard/blackrock company), I just cannot have an account(I get the ad breaks) or chat(for the better actually).