3 ms·
❖Average 25% - 30% saving on engagements ❖Better 60% (200GB System) ❖Best 78% (8GB per master with 12 masters) What are they wibbling about?
by Freaky 18y ago
❖Average 25% - 30% saving on engagements
❖Better 60% (200GB System)
❖Best 78% (8GB per master with 12 masters)
What are they wibbling about?
- ronaldbradford 18y agoAs a database architect expert, I generally average a 25-30% reduction in the Disk Footprint of the database, sometimes with zero impact for application changes. I use a very simple equation. DISK = MEMORY = PERFORMANCE Reducing the size of the disk footprint, and therefore the amount of disk reads (disk is the slowest of the 4 physical mediums) you improve performance. By then enabling more data to be stored in the appropriately tuned MySQL Memory buffers, you get a further increase in performance. For more information on this point, you can contact me at http://ronaldbradford.com/contact http://ronaldbradford.com/contact