The photographer only added the disclaimers after the criticisms. So she definitely misrepresented them. Also for the criticism fair use exception to copyright

The photographer only added the disclaimers after the criticisms. So she definitely misrepresented them. Also for the criticism fair use exception to copyright to apply, the criticism actually doesn’t have to be correct. Rather it just has to be criticism. The DMCA also isn’t meant to be used to stop a pile on or protect people from criticism that is leading to death threats. It has a narrow use and all of this drama around it doesn’t affect whether or not this is fair use or not. Also given that we know the photographer misrepresents things are we sure there are real death threats? Basically she is now the victim and blaming the accuser while also trying to silence the accuser. It is all so drama filled.