11 ms·

The about page from 27th November does have a notice that some images are composites: https://web.archive.org/web/20221127010417/https://kittiyapawlowski.com/co

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• sharpascents 4y ago
  I stand corrected. We don't know when this first disclaimer was orignially published / added though. And I would let people make their own decision whether they think her publication is misleading or not: https://kittiyapawlowski.com/snow-leopard-series https://kittiyapawlowski.com/snow-leopard-series edit: her disclaimer also reads like it was more reactive rather than precautionary: "I never stated my images were not edited anywhere".
  • shkkmo 4y ago
    She isn't a journalist, it is a side project. As she points out, misleading photos are common in all kinds of publications without a disclaimer. Does she deserve death threats? It is responsible to post a "debunking" article without actually reaching out to the artist to ask? I consider the "journalists" who wrote this article to be far more lacking in ethics than the artist who posted these photos.
  • _aavaa_ 4y ago
    Actually, we can know. There's a capture of the page from the day before (the 26th): https://web.archive.org/web/20221126060502/https://kittiyapawlowski.com/about-kittiya https://web.archive.org/web/20221126060502/https://kittiyapa... It does not contain that disclaimer. So, unless it was moved from another part of the website, there was no disclaimer before the article was published.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]