3 ms·
The image of the photographer is the least compelling bit of evidence. But two different parts of a mountain range that can't appear in the same shot with that
by 2muchcoffeeman 4y ago
The image of the photographer is the least compelling bit of evidence.
But two different parts of a mountain range that can't appear in the same shot with that perspective is not convincing? Really?
- steve_adams_86 4y agoEver heard of tectonic plates? Those mountains are practically ripping around like they’re on a go-kart track, who knows where they’ll appear in photos.