> What is the minimal level of effort required for it to count as 'training an AI chatbot' for you? Isn't GPT-3 already capable of acting like a chatbot out of

> What is the minimal level of effort required for it to count as 'training an AI chatbot' for you? Isn't GPT-3 already capable of acting like a chatbot out of the box? The article implies that it was trained to be like a younger Michelle from the journal entries, but all the responses presented seem to be utterly generic. Talk about dreams and hardships but not anything concrete, no mention of friends and family, locations or activities. I don't know enough about GPT-3 to say if the training affected word choice, but it doesn't seem to have any discernible depth at all.