3 ms·
I suppose we may disagree on the idea that America or Germany or the UK has an obligation to help China maintain the rule of law.
by from 4y ago
I suppose we may disagree on the idea that America or Germany or the UK has an obligation to help China maintain the rule of law.
- germinalphrase 4y agoPerhaps, less ‘obligation’ and more ‘interest’.
- from 4y agoHow about this: Why are we spending man hours investigating and [returning](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-repatriates-over-20-million-assets-stolen-former-nigerian-dictator https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-repatriates-ove...) millions of dollars to Nigeria when they have done almost nothing to stop the massive amount of romance and BEC scams coming from their country? Why are we [fining](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/utstarcom-inc-agrees-pay-15-million-penalty-acts-foreign-bribery-china https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/utstarcom-inc-agrees-pay-15-m...) [companies](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-billion-resolve-fcpa-case https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-bi...) for bribery in China when they pirate American software, steal American intellectual property and turn a blind eye to "research chemical" companies exporting tons of fentanyl? What I am saying is that instead of paying the third world's law enforcement bill for them we should try to stop getting ripped off first.