3 ms·

> It might come as a surprise, ... Please don't condescend. > Yes it's "free" to make a digital copy, but that ignores the cost of producing content. I am no

> It might come as a surprise, ... Please don't condescend. > Yes it's "free" to make a digital copy, but that ignores the cost of producing content. I am not ignoring the cost, I am simply not respecting it. They are trying to run a business; the costs of doing so are their problem. If they cannot capture revenue to offset the mentioned costs, then they do not have a viable business. Currently, copyright law is required for the revenue to be captured, thus the business is not viable. It is unfortunate, but I don't see how I am mistaken (I can understand disagreement that copyright law is broken, but it would be disagreement).

carewell 4y ago
How is this different from any other theft? I don’t respect the bakery down the road and will steal their products. Yes it’s protected by laws, but I don’t respect that either. It’s unfortunate, but it’s their own fault for not creating a viable business.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y ago
  > How is this different from any other theft? Nobody is being deprived of anything. If I buy a pastry from the bakery and then use a machine I own to materialize perfect copies of the pastry, what did I steal? Certainly not anything that needs to be replaced.
- LocalH 4y ago
  Infringement is not theft under any legal framework that is beholden to Berne