5 ms·

> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In

> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 12 of 14 (85%) AI-generated images. > You identified 14 of 16 (87%) human-made images. In general, I followed a pretty simple rule: - If it's a photograph, it's likely human if there're no immediate imperfections - If it's an illustration, it's AI if the art has imperfections OR if it's anime-adjacent (example: images with glossy lighting on human skin) Right now, SD-based art is trending towards a particular art style (anime-like & 3D-ish art), with little inherent ability towards creating subtle details in the background. It has a hard time drawing hands correctly, and often fails in drawing reflections. It also seems to have a hard time creating flat illustrations, or illustrations with limited color palates.

murphyslab 4y ago
> You correctly classified 26 of 30 (86%) images! > You identified 11 of 14 (78%) AI-generated images. > You identified 15 of 16 (93%) human-made images. Focal planes were another tell.
fastball 4y ago
I got 25 correct, and the majority of that was just looking at hands and text to see if they were messed up.
- lvoudour 4y ago
  Text is a very good indication the photo is non-AI. Lots of AI generated images struggle with it, I don't know why.
  - timeon 4y ago
    Messed text is also giveaway that you are in dream.
  - gpderetta 4y ago
    I think the AI need to be specifically trained to write. SD for example isn't although it tries its best.
- numpad0 4y ago
  All of anime images are also has the quintessential SD/NAI eyes, that’s another tell.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
hackerman123469 4y ago
You can often look at hand and ears and tell if it's AI or not.